Zeke argues that the reason there's so much difference in pay between different types of occupations is that some groups in society are exploiting and dominating others. Kris disagrees and instead makes the case that more societally important occupations have higher pay in order to attract the most qualified workers, which ensures that society runs smoothly. Kris's argument focuses on

Kris's argument emphasizes the functional role of social and economic inequality, positing that differences in pay among various occupations serve a purpose in maintaining the overall stability and efficiency of society. This perspective aligns with functionalism, a sociological theory that suggests different social structures and institutions contribute to the cohesiveness and functionality of society as a whole.

Kris believes that higher pay in certain essential occupations is necessary to attract talented individuals who can fulfill critical roles, ultimately ensuring that societal functions are carried out effectively. This view reinforces the idea that economic inequalities are not just arbitrary but are instead a reflection of the varying levels of responsibility and skills required in different job categories, thus maintaining order and promoting societal welfare.

Other perspectives, such as the inherent labor market conflict mentioned by Marx or Weber's concept of the Protestant ethic, do not align with Kris's argument. The focus on the functional necessity of providing incentives for qualified workers highlights the idea that income disparities can serve to motivate and attract individuals to roles that are crucial for societal operations. This functionalist lens provides insight into how economic systems are thought to operate for the benefit of society, rather than focusing on exploitation or social conflicts.